ticker
backtest

Regime gate matrix — bear and sideways

base vs rs_sector vs flow vs full vs SIT_FLAT on breakout_rr across stress windows.

Setup: breakout_rr · min_rr 2.0 · universe n=38
Question: which gate set survives bear and sideways tapes?

Bear 2022 (selected)

Gate Trades WR% ExpR Port% MDD
base 111 32.4 −0.162 −17.2% −27.4%
rs_sector 74 41.9 0.080 5.5% −16.6%
flow 39 43.6 0.092 3.3% −8.9%
market 67 22.4 −0.434 −25.6% −25.6%
full 12 33.3 −0.346 −4.1% −5.9%
SIT_FLAT 0 0.0% 0.0%

Sideways 2018 (selected)

Gate Trades WR% ExpR Port% MDD
base 228 39.5 0.078 16.9% −33.6%
rs_sector 125 48.0 0.307 44.8% −17.3%
flow 64 40.6 0.095 5.6% −15.3%
full 40 42.5 0.171 6.7% −12.7%
SIT_FLAT 0 0.0% 0.0%

Sideways 2023 Q3 (selected)

Most gate sets negative; SIT_FLAT control correctly stays flat. rs_sector still negative (−25.4% port) — regime sit is sometimes mandatory.

Winner pattern

Per-window winners favor rs_sector or flow in choppy/bear slices — not the heaviest full gate. Default paper uses rs_sector accordingly.

Source

Summarized from reports/regime_sit_compare_bear_sideways.md.

← all posts